10 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• nexx commented  ·  June 07, 2009 22:31  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  So, how much demand is enough? I think it's pretty good that this is 5th ranked when it's a rather small issue. Also, there aren't any comments in disagreement here -- not that no one will disagree, just that the disagree-ers probably aren't that abundant.

• Skyline commented  ·  June 07, 2009 19:38  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Wait, I've been reading this page chronologically backwards. Nevermind!

• Skyline commented  ·  June 07, 2009 19:38  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Err, that's obviously not the case, nexx. Did you read what arachnid said? It's easily implementable.

• Mae commented  ·  May 19, 2009 09:04  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This really bugs me. Ideally, a scroll system should be put in place, but I don't know how implement-able that is or how many maps it is limited to scroll through. If not, three newer and three older maps. Without exception, of course, because consistency is always better.

• nexx commented  ·  May 10, 2009 10:58  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Well that depends on what maps you're looking at. If you're browsing the newest page, you'll only be looking for older maps. If, on the other hand, you're looking at a featured map, you'd like to see older and newer stuff. But in any case, if the 3 older/3 newer thing were implemented, would a user's newest map show 6 older maps or still just 3?

• AdminArachnid (Admin, nmaps.net) commented  ·  May 10, 2009 03:52  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  It's certainly possible. I even had exactly this in place while I was still working on Newma, but concluded that it was more useful to show only older maps, since most people find maps through the newest one.

  If there's enough demand, I can certainly change it back, though.

• nexx commented  ·  May 09, 2009 23:20  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  So, Arachnid, is this possible or what?

• Zivilyn commented  ·  May 09, 2009 20:56  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Well, it shows six maps. Three before and three after would work great, except for on the newest three, which would just have more older ones than newer.

• ent474 commented  ·  October 23, 2008 17:36  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  I was going to do it, but you beat me.I dunno, maybe center in the middle with a red border, then 2 in front and back???

• nexx commented  ·  October 22, 2008 02:32  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Absolutely agreed. This has long been an annoyance for me. But perhaps it's difficult to implement because the 1 or 2 newest maps by an author would need to be made an exception to the rule or something. I just feel like for something this simple, if it hasn't alread been implemented, there's probably a good reason for it.